Why Isn’t Hydrogen Fuel Used Today?

  • By: David
  • Date: November 14, 2022
  • Time to read: 5 min.

why isnt hydrogen fuel used today

Hydrogen as a car fuel seems like a good solution to the environmental problems that we face. However, it is not a good choice for personal transportation. It’s extremely inefficient. Also, it takes a long time to produce enough hydrogen to power personal vehicles. Secondly, it’s expensive. It requires extensive infrastructure to distribute hydrogen fuel and use it.

Green hydrogen

The world’s economy depends on fossil fuels and the production of green hydrogen fuel could fulfill nearly one quarter of the world’s energy needs. But this would require a lot of investment in infrastructure, cost reduction, and production. It would be impossible to produce hydrogen without fossil fuels. Many governments are helping the hydrogen industry. The European Union has already created the European Hydrogen Strategy, which is a centerpiece of its Green Deal. This will encourage further innovation, cost reductions and infrastructure development. Australia and Japan have also set ambitious goals for green hydrogen production.

Ten countries are currently exploring green hydrogen projects in their efforts to increase energy security as well as exports. In May, Portugal announced a national hydrogen strategy that is expected to bring in $7 billion by 2030. Renewable developers also see green hydrogen as a promising new market. Orsted, an offshore wind energy leader, announced its first major project to produce green hydrogen for transportation.

Green hydrogen can also be used as a storage medium for excess energy. It can then be fed into a grid when required. This can help the world decarbonize the transportation, industrial and chemical sectors. Although green hydrogen technology is still in its infancy it might be worth a try in future, as renewable energy costs continue falling.

Despite its climate benefits, green hydrogen is not being used in today’s world. Green hydrogen fuel costs are higher than fossil fuels and leakage is a concern. Furthermore, hydrogen is an extremely potent greenhouse gas. Because of this, it is highly risky to inject hydrogen at large quantities. This could also pose a safety concern for household appliances and pipelines. However, with careful use, green hydrogen fuel can reduce the impact on climate by about seven percent.

Infrastructure required for hydrogen fuel distribution

The infrastructure required to distribute hydrogen fuel is crucial for the growth of the hydrogen economy. Hydrogen is a less dense, lighter, and less expensive fuel than gasoline, but it requires significantly more infrastructure to produce and distribute. In addition, hydrogen’s unique physical properties present special challenges to pipeline materials and compressor design. These issues should be considered before you build a hydrogen fuel distribution network.

For fueling vehicles, storing fuel and distribution to consumers, hydrogen infrastructure will be needed. The retail price of a liter of fuel will likely remain high at USD 1.00 per liter. This means that infrastructure investment is necessary. Nonetheless, this new fuel technology is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by almost 100%. To ensure fuel supply, it is crucial to develop and maintain sustainable hydrogen sources.

In addition to establishing a reliable hydrogen fuel distribution infrastructure, hydrogen needs to be transported safely from the point of production to the point of use. It will need to be compressed safely and transported to refueling stations and stationary power facilities. This logistics process can be costly and inefficient because hydrogen is so small in volume. The federal government’s PHMSA currently regulates approximately 700 miles worth of hydrogen pipelines within the United States. PHMSA recently introduced new rules that require pipelines meet certain safety standards. The agency also studies the effects of hydrogen upon steel pipelines.

Hydrogen fuel production, in addition to the technology and materials required, will require significant space. It will need space for compressors and electrolyzers, cables, pipelines, and access roads. A plant that can produce one million tonnes of hydrogen per year will need about 500 square kilometers.

Access to elemental hydrogen

Hydrogen has existed for billions upon billions of years, long before the Big Bang. Hydrogen has a low molecular weight and a wide range in uses. It is inflammable and colourless. It is also the most abundant element in the universe, making up 75 per cent of the total mass. Hydrogen can be categorized into three isotopes: H2, D2, HD, and T2. H2 is the most popular and is used in most fuels.

Hydrogen is an essential component of water. It is essential for the survival of life on Earth and is used to make hydrocarbons, glucose, as well as ammonia. Hydrogen is not often found in its natural state on Earth. This is because hydrogen requires energy in order to be produced in this form. There are two ways to make hydrogen fuel: electrolysis, which uses solar power or hydroelectricity to split water, or nuclear power, which can produce large amounts of hydrogen.

Governments and industry are becoming increasingly interested in hydrogen technology and its application. Recently, the EU unveiled a EUR750 billion plan that focuses on hydrogen as a top priority. This plan also calls to allow hydrogen to be traded freely across borders. Many governments recognize the importance of hydrogen as a key component of the net zero economy.

Hydrogen produced in this way is also a green alternative to fossil fuels, and it can reduce the need for transportation fuels. Hydrogen produced from hydrocarbons is a low-carbon, renewable energy source. Hydrogen fuel cells are more efficient that gasoline engines, regardless of how they are produced. A hydrogen fuel cell’s carbon footprint can be reduced by up to 50%

Blue hydrogen’s CO2 emissions

Blue hydrogen is currently not commercially viable despite its promise. There are only four projects around the world. Moreover, these projects achieve low levels of carbon capture. Shell’s Quest facility captures only 43% of its CO2 emissions. Nutrien’s plant captures 29%.

However, blue hydrogen has a much greater CO2 footprint than other fossil fuels. According to the CCC it can reduce emissions up to 85pc. This is a significant amount when compared to the global warming potential for the same amount carbon dioxide. Blue hydrogen is not capable to store CO2 indefinitely so its carbon footprint is higher than that of diesel oil.

Blue hydrogen’s GHG emissions are also higher than natural gas. In contrast, natural gas has a much lower methane emission rate. In addition, it is more expensive to produce. Blue hydrogen requires more energy than natural gas to make. Therefore, it is important to consider blue hydrogen’s carbon footprint before deciding on a new power generation technology.

Despite its apparent benefits, the environmental impact of blue hydrogen production is still difficult to assess. Methane is released during production. This is not a clean fuel. Therefore, it is difficult to justify its use on climate grounds. However, this does not mean that blue hydrogen is not viable.

Furthermore, in many regions of the world, the cost of blue hydrogen is still cheaper than green hydrogen. However, blue hydrogen is unlikely to overtake green hydrogen soon as natural gas prices rise. Therefore, green hydrogen should be the preferred choice for most people around the world.

Previous Post

Why Hydrogen As Fuel

Next Post

Does Hydrogen Fuel Have a Future?